|
Free-range
finances
3rd July
2008
I
have a great deal of my financial wealth with an
insurance company, consisting of an investment bond,
unit trusts and an Isa, as well as close to £100,000 of
my pension fund. However, I am becoming increasingly
concerned about the performance of this company. Can I
trust it when it tells me that I should take the long
view and that my investments are safe with it?
Insurance
companies are having to change with the times. The
independent advice sector has come to dominate the
distribution of retail financial products, including
investment bonds, unit trusts, Isas and pension plans,
for very good reasons. Included in these reasons is
access to the whole market.
Some
insurance companies offer access to a limited range of
external fund managers through their investment products
although they often try to claim that their limited
range is somehow sufficient or better than being able to
access the whole market.
A
second factor is that many IFAs are now offering
independent advice which is separate from the actual
financial product. There is a growing demand for this
impartial advice and also a growing acceptance that it
has to be paid for. Almost every financial journalist or
commentator believes that to get impartial, competent
advice, you need to pay for it separately from any
commission generated by a financial product.
Indeed,
the FSA has also recognised this, proposing a separation
of advice from sales. There is a strong desire for the
intermediary and consumer to determine the price to be
paid for advice and implementation without influence
from the product manufacturer.
Of
course, your current provider may be perfectly
satisfactory. It may well argue that it provides you
with advice but that is not really why it exists. It
exists to sell you financial products. It bundles in an
element of advice but that is a small part of the
process.
Its
advice is about the suitability, given your
circumstances, of the products that it wants to sell
you. This is evidenced by the way its
"advisers" are paid. They are only paid if you
buy a product from them. Few, if any, charge for the
"advice" if you do not buy a product.
In
other words, you can distinguish advisers from
salespeople simply by asking: "Do you get paid if I
do not buy a financial product?" If the answer is
no, they are not advisers, they are salespeople.
You
may want to employ an adviser to review your portfolio.
It may well be that you do not need to make any changes
to it. On the other hand, they may well be able to
recommend changes that are in your financial interest.
You
point out that you have a great deal of your financial
wealth tied up with this insurance company. It is
questionable if that is good practice. The financial
services sector is a dynamic, frequently changing
environment and you may well be missing out on more
competitive and more suitable plans if your selected
provider does not move with the times.
You
are concerned with the performance of this company. By
this, I assume you mean the performance of the
investment funds rather than the firm itself. Your
products and investment funds should reflect your
attitude towards investment risk, reward and volatility
and should match your financial planning goals and
objectives.
You
may wish to ask the company for a statement as to how
your financial products match up to those factors. This
does not have to be in the form of a complaint. You are
initially seeking information and it might make sense to
get a response from the insurance company before you
discuss your requirements with an independent adviser.
A
wholly independent, impartial adviser will approach your
requirements without an inbuilt bias to convince you to
transfer your assets away from the insurance company but
to ensure that what you have got and what you might do
with it is suitable.
This
article was first published by Money Marketing.
You
are here: home
> news
& resources
>
financial planning articles
> free-range finances
|